Evolution, Creation and Heliocentrism

by Christine on February 10, 2006

Creation and the Theory of Evolution certainly does spark passionate debate. Let me list two examples from today:

A $1000.00 check is being offered to the first person who can prove that the earth revolves around the sun. Catholic Apologetics International is holding the contest. In doing this they are reopening the science vs. the Bible debate regarding the Bible’s many references to the sun revolving around the earth. Here is a short clip:

If Scripture can be dismissed by claiming that it is mostly a collection of myths and fables from ignorant and primitive people; and if the Church can be faulted for siding with an aberrant view of cosmology; then modern man thinks he has found the ultimate excuse for relieving himself of being bound by either Scripture or the Church.

That is not all. If one examines the so-called “scientific proofs” for either Evolution or Heliocentrism, the proofs simply do not exist. Yet modern man, so desperate to find his excuses, has turned mere theories into “facts,” and has thereby convinced the world that IT, not the Church or Scripture, is the king of truth.

I ask this question – can one challenge the theory of evolution using Genesis 1 – 2, and still accept science’s judgement that the earth revolves around the sun? This is the kind of emotional debate that brings us back to Chapter 1 of the Westminster Confession of Faith – The Authority, Inerrancy, Infallibility, and Sufficiency of Scripture. What we learned from Chapter 1, is that the answer to the above question is Yes and No.

The second example today is the celebration of Evolution Sunday by a number of churches – including one in my hometown (United Methodist Church of Sudbury). They are celebrating the 197th anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin.

On 12 February 2006 hundreds of Christian churches from all portions of the country and a host of denominations will come together to discuss the compatibility of religion and science. For far too long, strident voices, in the name of Christianity, have been claiming that people must choose between religion and modern science. More than 10,000 Christian clergy have already signed The Clergy Letter demonstrating that this is a false dichotomy.

Praise God that we can gather on this same Sunday and offer worship and praise to the one and only Triune God who created the universe.

What is the work of creation?

The work of creation is, God’s making all things of nothing, by the word of his power, in the space of six days, and all very good. – Westminster Shorter Catechism

{ 1 comment }

Consistent with thy Eternal Counsels

by Christine on February 8, 2006

How do we pray as believers who trust in God’s eternal decrees? According the the Westminster Shorter Catechism, “The decrees of God are his eternal purpose, according to the counsel of his will, whereby, for his own glory, he hath fore-ordained whatsoever comes to pass”. Do we always just pray “if it is your will?” Sometimes that becomes a trite phrase due to constant repetition – is there not a richer way to pray?

In Valley of Vision there is a portion of a prayer titled “The All Good” that expands on praying for God’s will.

If it be consistent with thy eternal counsels,

the purpose of thy grace,

and the great ends of thy glory,

then bestow upon me the blessings of thy comforts;

If not, let me resign myself to

thy wiser determinations.

Creation

by Christine on February 8, 2006

Last night I had the privilege of hearing Dr. Michael Behe, the author of Darwin’s Black Box speak. Dr. Behe presents a scientific argument for the existence of God. He spoke to a large and diverse group about the many convincing proofs of Intelligent Design.

We are about to begin our study in the Westminster Confession in Chapter 4 – Creation. This is an emotional as well as complex area of study. Last night, emotions ran high as several very smart university students, scientists, and professors challenged intelligent design. Science is often factual and unemotional. Last night, you saw the intersection of religion and science, as voices cracked and tempers flared, when Darwin’s theory of evolution was challenged. You cannot discuss creation or the “orgin of species“ without entering the realm of the metaphysical. This is the realm of God.

Today as I was reflecting on last night‘s lecture I came across this wonderful discovery. Here in the jungles of New Guinea: (HT Powerline)

An expedition to one of Asia’s most isolated jungles, in the mist-shrouded Foya Mountains of western New Guinea (Irian Jaya), has discovered a host of new species, giant flowers, and rare wildlife.

The December 2005 expedition by a team of US, Indonesian, and Australian scientists led by Conservation International (CI) found dozens of new species including frogs, butterflies, plants, and what is thought to be the first new bird from the island of New Guinea in more than 60 years. “It’s as close to the Garden of Eden as you’re going to find on Earth,” marvelled CI’s Bruce Beehler, co-leader of the expedition.

The new species of honeyeater, yet to be described, has a bright orange face-patch with a pendant wattle under each eye.

honeycreeper

Here is a picture of the Honeyeater, for more pictures go here.

New species, new flowers, frogs, butterflies, plants – all new to us – but created and known by God. One can only cry out as we learn more about God’s creation:

“O Lord, our Lord, how majestic is your name above all the earth,

You set your glory above the heavens” Psalm 8:1

Election & Calvinism

by Christine on February 3, 2006

Here is part of an intriguing post of one Pastor’s journey from Arminianism to Calvinism:

I was also exposed to the results of “decisional” conversions. I can remember preaching one evening of a revival service (no comments please) and when it came to the invitation (again, no comments), I was able to get seventeen people to come forward. As they came, I asked them why they were coming. Few could communicate a clear answer. To my knowledge, none profess Christ to this day. I was shaken. My approach to ministry was shaken. I returned to my study the next week with different questions in my mind. Thank God for the sovereign work of the Holy Spirit through His word.

Read the whole thing at Coming to Calvinism – A Personal Journey (2 parts).

Reformation Theology has a wealth of information on Election and Predestination. Here is a great quote they posted today:

After giving a brief survey of these doctrines of sovereign grace, I asked for questions from the class. One lady, in particular, was quite troubled. She said, ‘This is the most awful thing I’ve ever heard! You make it sound as if God is intentionally turning away men and women who would be saved, receiving only the elect.’ I answered her in this vein: ‘You misunderstand the situation. You’re visualizing that God is standing at the door of heaven, and men are thronging to get in the door, and God is saying to various ones, ‘Yes, you may come, but not you, and you, but not you, etc.’ The situation is hardly this. Rather, God stands at the door of heaven with His arms outstretched, inviting all to come. Yet all men without exception are running in the opposite direction towards hell as hard as they can go. So God, in election, graciously reaches out and stops this one, and that one, and this one over here, and that one over there, and effectually draws them to Himself by changing their hearts, making them willing to come. Election keeps no one out of heaven who would otherwise have been there, but it keeps a whole multitude of sinners out of hell who otherwise would have been there. Were it not for election, heaven would be an empty place, and hell would be bursting at the seams. That kind of response, grounded as I believe that it is in Scriptural truth, does put a different complexion on things, doesn’t it? If you perish in hell, blame yourself, as it is entirely your fault. But if you should make it to heaven, credit God, for that is entirely His work! To Him alone belong all praise and glory, for salvation is all of grace, from start to finish. – Mark Webb

Born and raised on the Scofield Reference Bible, having walked down the aisle many times, railing at God for not letting everyone in – by God’s grace and the work of the Holy Spirit I’m finally beginning to see the “joy of my salvation”. The doctrines of Election and Predestination, the books of Romans and Ephesians, the work of the Spirit have pointed the way. Glory be to God!

Westminster around the Web

by Christine on February 2, 2006

It’s been a few weeks since I’ve posted. We’ve been studying God’s Eternal Decree. A difficult area that has taken me full-time to the books. Even in 4 weeks – we left so much to uncover. Maybe next time….

Meanwhile – for deeper study on the Infralapsarianism and Supralapsarianism issue this link will get you started. Here Jason Robertson has posted some helpful charts and lists. Make sure you click on the B. B. Warfield chart at the bottom. Don’t spend to long on this – your brain may cramp up!

Over at this same blog Fide-o – I found this interesting quote:

There, I am persuaded, I shall see dear Mr. Wesley convinced of election and everlasting love. And it often fills me with pleasure to think how I shall behold you casting your crown down at the feet of the Lamb, and as it were filled with a holy blushing for opposing the divine sovereignty in the manner you have done.

– excerpt of the famous letter from Whitfield to Wesley

At one of my favorite blogs, Reformation Theology, Rev. John Samson posts on Ordo Salutis in the Reformed and Arminian camps. He effectively shows the difference between the placement of regeneration and faith.

Lastly, I can’t recommend enough some of Sovereign Grace Ministries music. Today we listened to The Look – which reminds of Christ’s pure atoning grace. I really like 2 CD’s, Songs for the Cross Centered Life and Upward: The Bob Kauflin Hymns Project. You can listen to clips of all the songs at their website. They are also available in ITunes.

That’s it for God’s Eternal Decree – so much to say, but almost impossible to blog about. As we move on to Creation and Providence expect more!

Is Judas Misunderstood?

by Christine on January 13, 2006

According to The Times, Judas Iscariot is undergoing an extreme makeover by the Catholic Church.

Judas the Misunderstood – Europe – Times Online:

The proposed “rehabilitation” of the man who was paid 30 pieces of silver to identify Jesus to Roman soldiers in the Garden of Gethsemane, comes on the ground that he was not deliberately evil, but was just “fulfilling his part in God’s plan”.

Christians have traditionally blamed Judas for aiding and abetting the Crucifixion, and his name is synonymous with treachery. According to St Luke, Judas was “possessed by Satan”.

Now, a campaign led by Monsignor Walter Brandmuller, head of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Science, is aimed at persuading believers to look kindly at a man reviled for 2,000 years.

What does this have to do with Westminster Confession and God’s Eternal Decree? We read in Chapter 3, section I – IV and VII:

I. God from all eternity, did, by the most wise and holy counsel of His own will, freely, and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass; yet so, as thereby neither is God the author of sin, nor is violence offered to the will of the creatures; nor is the liberty or contingency of second causes taken away, but rather established.

II. Although God knows whatsoever may or can come to pass upon all supposed conditions; yet has He not decreed anything because He foresaw it as future, or as that which would come to pass upon such conditions.

III. By the decree of God, for the manifestation of His glory, some men and angels are predestinated unto everlasting life; and others foreordained to everlasting death.

IV. These angels and men, thus predestinated, and foreordained, are particularly and unchangeably designed, and their number so certain and definite, that it cannot be either increased or diminished.

VII. The rest of mankind God was pleased, according to the unsearchable counsel of His own will, whereby He extends or withholds mercy, as He pleases, for the glory of His sovereign power over His creatures, to pass by; and to ordain them to dishonor and wrath for their sin, to the praised of His glorious justice.

These sections deal with God’s sovereignty, God’s election and predestination, God’s foreordination, the reprobate, man’s free-will and man’s responsibility, and finally God’s mercy.

R.C. Sproul in Essentials Truths of the Christian Faith states the Judas was no less evil or treacherous just because God ordained that Jesus be betrayed by Judas. Sproul sums up God’s sovereignty over Judas in this way:

His laws, whether they be found in the Scripture or in the heart, are binding. We have no authority to violate this will. We have the power or ability to thwart the preceptive will of God, though never the right to do so. Nor can we excuse ourselves for sinning by saying, “Que sera, sera.” It may be God’s sovereign or hidden will that we be “permitted” to sin, as he brings His sovereign will to pass even through and by means of the sinful acts of people. God ordained that Jesus be betrayed by the instrument of Judas’s treachery. Yet this makes Judas’s sin no less evil or treacherous. When God “permits” us to break His preceptive will, it is not to be understood as permission in the moral sense of His granting us a moral right. His permission gives us the power, but not the right to sin.

The Times goes on to report:

Father Allen Morris, Christian Life and Worship secretary for the Catholic Bishops of England and Wales, said: “If Christ died for all — is it possible that Judas too was redeemed through the Master he betrayed?” The “rehabilitation” of Judas could help the Pope’s drive to improve Christian-Jewish relations, which he has made a priority of his pontificate.

Other than a strange turn into political correctness, what else does this statement say? It says that – Christ died for all – even the reprobate Judas. However, Jesus knew that Judas did not have a genuine faith. Jesus says, ” Did I not choose you, the twelve, and one of you is a devil?” (John 6:70). John later wrote in the same chapter of his gospel that “Jesus knew from the first who those were that did not believe, and who it was that would betray him” (John 6:64). Christ died for the elect – clearly not for Judas. Judas’ betrayal was said to be according to Scripture (Acts 1:16; John 17:12), but God does not hold him any less responsible for it. Man is responsible for their sins, the wages of sin must be paid. Christ’s life of obedience and death on the cross paid that price, for those he has chosen.

Lastly, the Times says:

Signor Messori said that the rehabilitation of Judas would “resolve the problem of an apparent lack of mercy by Jesus toward one of his closest collaborators”.

Lack of mercy by Jesus??? Let’s close by looking how this “rehabilitation of Judas” is what Luther called “Mistress Reason”, a mistress that has a strong grip on this world:

“Reason will insist that these are not the acts of a good and merciful God. They are too far beyond her grasp; and she cannot bring herself to believe that the God Who acts and judges thus is good; she wants to shut out faith, and to see, and feel, and understand, how it is that He is good and not cruel. She would certainly understand, were it said of God that He hardens none and damns none, but has mercy on all and saves all, so that hell is destroyed, and the fear of death may be put away, and no future punishment need be dreaded!”

“[I]f God foreknew that Judas would be a traitor, Judas became a traitor of necessity, and it was not in the power of Judas or of any creature to act differently, or to change his will, from that which God had foreseen. It is true that Judas acted willingly, and not under compulsion, but his willing was the work of God, brought into being by His omnipotence, like everything else. . . .If you do not allow that the thing which God foreknows is necessarily brought to pass, you take away faith and the fear of God, you undermine all the Divine promises and threatenings, and so you deny Deity itself!” The Bondage of the Will, Martin Luther

This is a strong statement in favor of maintaining God’s sovereign will over even evil events and actions such as Judas Iscariot’s betrayal of Jesus. I don’t believe Judas is misunderstood!

Technorati Tags: , ,

God’s Eternal Decree – Chapter 3

by Christine on January 13, 2006

Back from our Christmas break – it’s time to move on to Chapter 3 – God’s Eternal Decree. This is a glorious and difficult chapter. Glorious because it reminds us of God’s sovereign election, difficult because it affirms that some are foreordained to everlasting death. But, this is just a part of God’s Eternal Decree. It will be a full and rich study. After Chapter 3, we will be reminded how much more we owe to God’s grace and mercy, more than we ever realized.

Memory Verse for Chapter 3: Ephesians 1:3-6

Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love he predestined us for adoption through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved.

Westminster Shorter Catechism question 7:

Q: What are the decrees of God?

A: The decrees of God are, his eternal purpose, according to the counsel of his will, whereby, for his own glory, he hath foreordained whatsoever comes to pass.

Hymn: When this Passing World is Done – Trinity Hymnal, p. 545

Technorati Tags:

Westminster around the Web

by Christine on November 28, 2005

This week on Westminster around the Web we’ll focus on the doctrine of Trinity. Let’s see what is being blogged concerning this great doctrine:

The Da Vinci Code is popular and now being made into a big Hollywood movie. One of the key claims of the The Da Vinci Code is that the doctrine of the Trinity and the deity of Christ was a creation of Constantine. Here, James White (who wrote a terrific book, The Forgotten Trinity) – is currently doing a multi-part review of the Da Vinci Code. James White translates a sermon preached approximately 145 years prior to Nicea, and 130 years prior to Constantine’s battle where he allegedly saw the sign of the cross in the sky and the phrase, “in this sign, conquer”. This sermon was preached on Passover around 180 A.D. by Melito, bishop of Sardis.

And so he was lifted up upon a tree and an inscription was attached indicating who was being killed. Who was it? It is a grievous thing to tell, but a most fearful thing to refrain from telling. But listen, as you tremble before him on whose account the earth trembled!

He who hung the earth in place is hanged.

He who fixed the heavens in place is fixed in place.

He who made all things fast is made fast on a tree.

The Sovereign is insulted.

God is murdered.

The King of Israel is destroyed by an Israelite hand.

This is the One who made the heavens and the earth,

and formed mankind in the beginning,

The One proclaimed by the Law and the Prophets,

The One enfleshed in a virgin,

The One hanged on a tree,

The One buried in the earth,

The One raised from the dead and who went up into the heights of heaven,

The One sitting at the right hand of the Father,

The One having all authority to judge and save,

Through Whom the Father made the things which exist from the beginning of time.

This One is “the Alpha and the Omega,”

This One is “the beginning and the end”

—the beginning indescribable and the end incomprehensible.

This One is the Christ.

This One is the King.

This One is Jesus.

This One is the Leader.

This One is the Lord.

This One is the One who rose from the dead.

This One is the One sitting on the right hand of the Father.

He bears the Father and is borne by the Father.

“To him be the glory and the power forever. Amen.”

As James White says, “…rejoice, as I rejoice, at the thought of this ancient believer and the fact that he reveled in the truth about the God-man Jesus Christ just as we do today! Oh that we had more preaching like this in our land today!”

Greg Koukl over at Stand to Reason writes Does the Trinity Make Sense? What I like is a comment on the Stand to Reason Blog – here a commenter says:

Technorati Tags: ,

[click to continue…]

Basil against the Spirit Fighters

by Christine on November 28, 2005

The Westminster Shorter Catechism asks in Question 6:

How many persons are there in the Godhead?

There are three persons in the Godhead; the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory.

The doctrine of the Holy Trinity was always a part of the early church, but not always clearly defined, and often under attack. At the Council of Nicea in 325, the phrase “bBasil the Greategotten not made,” and “of one essence with the Father” was written. But the belief that the Holy Ghost is God and equal in power and glory remained unclear.

The Arians had lost when they tried to deny Christ’s divinity. Now the Arianizers were trying to cast doubt on the person of the Holy Spirit.

Basil of Caesarea was born shortly after the Council of Nicea. His parents were born in a time of great persecution. But by the time Basil was born, the persecution of church was perpetrated by Christians against Christians. There was a group called “Pneumatomachi” (fighters against the Spirit) who were denying that the Spirit was fully God. Eustathius was a leader among the “Spirit fighters”, and a friend and mentor of Basil.

Michael Haykin writes this week about Basil, the fight for orthodoxy and a loss of his friend Eustathius.

Eustathius’ interest in the Spirit seems to have been focused on the Spirit’s work, not his person. For him, the Holy Spirit was primarily a divine gift within the Spirit-filled person, One who produced holiness [Wolf-Dieter Hauschild, “Eustathius von Sebaste”, Theologische Realenzyklopädie, 10 (1982), 548-549]. When, on one occasion at a synod in 364, he was pressed to say what he thought of the Spirit’s nature, he replied: “I neither chose to name the Holy Spirit God nor dare to call him a creature”! (Socrates, Church History 2.45).

For a number of years, Basil sought to win Eustathius over to the orthodox position. Finally, in the summer of 373 he met with him for an important two-day colloquy, in which, after much discussion and prayer, Eustathius finally acquiesced to an orthodox view of the Spirit’s nature. At a second meeting Eustathius signed a statement of faith in which it was stated that:

Technorati Tags: , ,

[click to continue…]

There is no Plan B

by Christine on November 21, 2005

The Doctrine of God leads us to a study of God’s attributes. A. W. Pink has written the classic book, The Attributes of God. It is in this small book that he covers the infinite attributes of God’s foreknowledge and the decrees of God.

Before going into Pink’s writing let me demonstrate an unfortunate error (heresy) that is growing in the evangelical church today. It is the Openness of God controversy – or Open Theism. I find this thinking occasionally creeping in, as I am in conversation with other dear Christians.

Lignon Duncan has written about this controversy – and demonstrates one compelling example of the error – read and think!

In his book, (Greg Boyd – The God of the Possible) Boyd tells the story goes that a young woman raised in a Christian home, from a very young age a devoted disciple of Jesus Christ, longed in her early years to be a missionary and longed to marry a godly man who would share a similar goal, and they would go to Taiwan and minister for the rest of the days of their life. That was the desire of her heart. And, lo and behold, at Bible College she met this young man who shared her vision for Taiwan. He was godly, he was committed, and they fell in love. And for three and a half years they courted one another, they prayed together, they went to church together, they prepared themselves for the mission field, and during their senior year, this man proposed to her. Not surprisingly, this young woman named Suzanne immediately said yes. And so for several months they fasted and they prayed over the matter, and they concluded that this marriage was God’s will, and that gave her a sense of confirmation that this is what God would have her do. And so with a sense of joy and peace, they marched into life. But shortly after college, the newly married couple went away to missionary school, and two years into this training, Suzanne learned that her husband was an adulterer. He was cheating on her, involved in an adulterous affair with a fellow student at the missionary college. He repented initially, but then he went right back to the affair, and despite Christian counseling, that pattern repeated itself over and over and over during the next years. As you can imagine, their dream for the mission field was immediately shattered, and eventually, their marriage broke up. And so Suzanne came to Mr. Boyd for counsel. “How do I interpret this? I was trying to do God’s will, and look at what has happened to my life.” Here’s the pastoral counsel, here’s the wise pastoral advice that open theism is ultimately able to offer: “Suzanne, take comfort. God didn’t know this was going to happen. This caught him just as off guard as it caught you. But here’s the good news, Suzanne, sometimes God’s plan B can be just as good as his plan A.” So much for the pastoral counsel of open theism.

Does God have a Plan B?

Let’s go to A. W. Pink:

[click to continue…]